Head to Head: Apple Watch vs. Fitbit Blazedgs

Choose the right smartwatch for your needs and it could become an integral part of your everyday life. Choose the wrong one and it may end up buried in a desk drawer.

At Apple's iPhone SE launch event this week, CEO Tim Cook announced the Apple Watch is the "best-selling" smartwatch in the world and said the company is immediately slashing the starting price of the Apple Watch by $50, to $299.

Apple has set the bar in the battle of the stylish smartwatches but faces a formidable opponent from the Fitbit Blaze, a slightly more budget-friendly wearable device that packs many (but not all) of the same features.

Apple's March iPhone Event
What You Need to Know About Apple Watch
US Government May Not Need Apple's Help After All in Encryption Case
Fitbit's smartwatch made its debut at the Consumer Electronics Show in January and was released this month. Here's a look at how the two watches stack up head to head.

The Basics

The Fitbit Blaze is aimed at style-conscious consumers who want to track the usual fitness metrics but also want other capabilities, such as reading text messages, viewing their calendar and controlling the music on a paired smartphone.

The Apple Watch is designed to "be an essential part of who you are," according to Apple's website. It has all of the usual fitness tracking and can keep you on track for your appointments, advise you when you may need an umbrella or show you a text message from a friend, among other features.

Price

The Fitbit Blaze retails for $199.95. With its latest price cut, the Apple Watch Sport starts at $299.

Apple offers watches in three models: the Apple Watch Sport, Apple Watch and the high-end Apple Watch Edition.

Style

Both wearables offer changeable bands, including higher-end options that allow both devices to transform from something you'd wear at the gym into a device that can easily be styled with business attire.

The option seems to be a winning one for Apple -- Tim Cook said as many as one-third of Apple Watch owners change their bands on a regular basis. At the iPhone event on Monday, Apple introduced a new lineup of bands made from woven nylon, new colors for the Apple Watch Sport and a space black version of its higher-end Milanese loop.

Fitbit's options range from "classic" bands in colors including black, plum and blue to a variety of leather bands and a stainless steel band retaining for $129.95.

Charging

To charge the Fitbit Blaze, pop the screen out from the band, insert the device into a charging cradle and plug it into a USB port. Apple's process is more seamless, allowing users attach a magnetic charging cable to the back of the Apple Watch to gain power from either an outlet or a USB port.

Fitbit Blaze's Winning Feature

Where Fitbit comes out on top is battery life. The Blaze can go as much as five days without needing to charge, whereas the Apple Watch has a battery life of around 18 hours, according to Apple. Bear in mind, how you use your watch and the available features will have an effect on its battery.

While the Blaze won't have the rich app ecosystem Apple Watch owners enjoy, the wearable costs about $100 less than the Apple Watch Sport, making it ideal for people who are just looking for a stylish wearable offering fitness and daily communication capabilities.

Apple Watch's Winning Feature

The Apple Watch stands out because of its rich ecosystem of apps and the flow of new ones becoming available. Developers have created new experiences for the wrist, allowing users to do everything from ordering an Uber to checking Twitter to controlling their Internet-connected home.

Bottom Line

The Fitbit Blaze is ideal for someone looking for a fitness tracker and a basic personal assistant that doesn't require nightly charging. If budget isn't an issue -- and you're looking for a wearable to fully integrate into your routine -- then the Apple Watch may be the way to go.

Will Apple ever release a Mac hybrid?dvs

Apple now claims two “ultimate” Windows PC replacements, iPad Pro tablets and MacBooks, but the company should look to bridge the gap between those two hardware lines, some analysts say.


As device usage and applications evolve, it will be harder for Apple to distinguish between the iPad Pro and products like the MacBook Air, analysts say.


Apple has aimed the iPad Pro line at users interested in Web browsing and productivity applications and MacBooks at power users. But as more applications are likely to use touchscreens, Apple may need to develop products that merge features like touch with advanced computing capabilities.


That sort of transition would mirror developments already happening on Windows PCs, where tablets and laptops are merging into hybrid devices like Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4.


Apple’s iPads feature iOS and screen sizes under 12.9 inches and are targeted at users comfortable with mobile computing. Apple has pitched its new 9.7-inch iPad Pro, announced this week, as a tablet that can function as a laptop when needed, but it lacks features such as an SD card slot, USB port, and display ports that make it a true PC replacement. 


MacBooks have screen sizes starting at 11 inches and run Mac OS X, an operating system aimed at users needing a more full-featured computer.


The merging of features from these products, in theory, could result in a product like a MacBook Air with a touchscreen and more port options than an iPad Pro. Those features could make Apple a closer competitor to Microsoft and its Surface, which can serve both mobile and power users. But any change in Apple’s products won’t come for years, analysts said.


Apple risks confusing customers if it positions two products as PC replacements, said Bob O’Donnell, principal analyst at Technalysis Research.


For now, Apple isn’t yet ready to pit MacBooks against iPads, but over time may need to bring iPad Pro features to MacBooks, or vice versa, to meet the computing needs of customers, O’Donnell said.


“Apple clearly believes that Mac OS, Mac apps and MacBooks should be touch-free, while touch-based apps belong on iPads and iOS,” he added. “Over time, this seems to be more arbitrary and not well-suited to current demands.”


With the iPad Pro and MacBook Air, Apple is trying to reach the broadest number of users and applications, said Jim McGregor, principal analyst at Tirias Research.


“Apple’s difficulty is in managing two completely different hardware and software platforms,” McGregor said. “If I was to bet on the future, I would bet on an Apple hardware-based platform with a single OS within the next few years.”


But there’s a challenge in merging the two operating systems, said Kevin Krewell, McGregor’s colleague at Tirias Research.


Keeping the two OSes separated allows Apple to manage complexity in a way that Microsoft cannot when trying to merge three operating systems, for PCs, smartphones and the Xbox, into one core Windows 10 OS, Krewell said.


There are additional hardware challenges. Apple’s devices with iOS run on homegrown ARM-based chips, and Macs run on Intel chips. To merge OSes, Apple may have to move its Mac OS over to ARM-based chips, which is no small task because the company is already pushing performance boundaries with its own chips. 


“Apple had significant help from Intel in porting to the x86 architecture,” McGregor said. “However, it is in Apple’s interest to keep pursuing its own [chips] and to use them as widely as possible.”


Apple will ultimately figure out where to draw the lines in the Mac-iPad divide. The market will tell the company how to position each product, McGregor said.


Apple’s iPad shipments have been declining. The company shipped 16 million iPads in the first financial quarter of 2016, a decline from the 21.4 million units shipped in the same quarter a year earlier.


Tablet shipments totaled 206.8 million in 2015, declining by 10.1 percent from 2014, according to IDC. But shipments of hybrids like the Surface and iPad Pro are growing, IDC said. 

Apple Insider See realtime coverage Latest iOS 9.3 update renders some older iPads unusablefgs


An unknown number of iPad owners, specifically those with second-generation models, are having trouble installing and activating the latest iOS version released Monday, according to posts on Apple's Support Communities forum and readers who reached out to AppleInsider

The issue, which appears to be limited to older iPads, usually presents itself during the activation stageand multiple users have reported seeing authentication error messages. While the symptom suggests overly congested activation servers on Apple's end — situation normal for a new firmware release — some iPad owners have been waiting for 24 hours without luck.

A few Support pages forum members said they were able to work around the issue by downloading iOS 9.3 through iTunes on a Mac and installing over a hardwired USB connection, but others have attempted the same without success. Another method that proved effective for some is a full restore. It is recommended that users conduct a local or iCloud backup prior to restoring their device as the process erases all user data.

At least one Support Communities member affected by the potential bug took their device into a local Apple Store for help, but employees were unable to offer assistance.

Apple has not issued a statement regarding the matter and did not respond to a request for comment.